Ad Executives Accused of Bilking the Government

Not even the government’s war on drugs is immune from the scandals gripping corporate America. The Associated Press reported yesterday that the government is charging two ad industry executives with conspiracy for supposedly overcharging the government for an anti-drug campaign.

The Ogilvy & Mather advertising agency was hired in 1998 by the Office of the National Drug Control Policy, part of the Executive Office of the President, to oversee a print and broadcast campaign on the dangers of drugs, designed to discourage drug use among young people. The campaign concluded last week.

Thomas Early, 48, director of finance at Ogilvy's New York office, and Shona Seifert, who once directed Ogilvy's $684 million contract with the government, were accused Tuesday in a federal indictment with directing employees to exaggerate their work on the project when they filled out time sheets, the Associated Press reported. Seifert left the agency two years ago and is now president of TBWA/Chiat/Day, New York. She said Tuesday: "Neither with respect to the indictment announced by the U.S. attorney's office nor at any other time in my life have I ever committed any criminal misdeed of any nature."

Early resigned from Ogilvy to "devote his full energies to obtaining a full vindication in this matter," the company said, and AP reported. Early and Seifert both pleaded innocent yesterday in Manhattan federal court and were each freed on $500,000 bonds, after both posted $25,000 in collateral. They are due back in court for a pre-trial hearing on Feb. 13. If convicted, they both could face up to five years in prison for each of the 11 counts contained in the indictment as well as millions of dollars in fines, the AP reported.

Ogilvy, which was not charged, said it was unprepared for complex and unique federal recordkeeping rules but changed its procedures when it realized it was not meeting federal requirements.

The agency said the government was not billed after the summer of 2000 when its internal recordkeeping system was modified, leading to the discovery of billing mistakes. The government was compensated for the mistakes in a civil suit.

In a statement, the agency said its new system was certified by both outside auditors and government auditors and the agency "instituted the most rigorous accounting compliance program in our industry."

You may like these other stories...

Camp Hopes Estate Tax Will Be on Its Way OutAn article in Bloomberg said that Republicans are considering voting this year to repeal the U.S. estate tax, according to House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R.-Mich.). He...
Read more from Larry Perry here and in the Today's World of Audits archive.Learning "how" to audit cash is mainly learning "when" to audit cash and to "what extent" cash auditing procedures...
Senate Takes Different Approach from House for Highway and Bridge FundEarlier this week, according to a New York Times article, the Senate agreed to fill the coffers of the fund that pays for highway and bridge repairs with...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.
Aug 20
In this session we'll review best practices for how to generate interest in your firm’s services.
Aug 21
Meet budgets and client expectations using project management skills geared toward the unique challenges faced by CPAs. Kristen Rampe will share how knowing the keys to structuring and executing a successful project can make the difference between success and repeated failures.
Aug 28
Excel spreadsheets are often akin to the American Wild West, where users can input anything they want into any worksheet cell. Excel's Data Validation feature allows you to restrict user inputs to selected choices, but there are many nuances to the feature that often trip users up.