AICPA Reaps Dividend From Sarbanes-Oxley
Audit reforms still pose new frontiers, but the members of the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) are trying to put the worst battles behind them and making an effort to put to good use their $2-per-member dividend from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The amount of the dividend represents the funding AICPA has in the past provided each year to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). AICPA spokesperson Linda Dunbar explains, "The $2-per-member amount is a number that was assigned in 1978 by AICPA as a reasonable amount to allocate to FASB, and it has been honored annually since then."
Starting in 2003, however, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the FASB will be funded largely through fees paid by public companies under a system to be set up by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which in turn is overseen by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). So the AICPA is now free to reallocate the $2-per-member funds for the benefit of its members.
Asked how the funds will be spent, Ms. Dunbar said the money would be used for initiatives described in speeches made by AICPA President Barry Melancon and AICPA Chairman Bill Ezzell. These initiatives include improving financial reporting, reforming corporate governance and internal controls to combat fraud, and ensuring appropriate-standard setting for the accounting profession.
Among the early results of these and other initiatives is a series of white papers and issue briefings posted on the AICPA's Web site to help forge a reasonable path through the emerging frontiers of state regulation. The papers were released by the newly formed AICPA Special Committee on State Regulation.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.