AICPA Provides Help With Troublesome GAO Rules

A Web site notice from the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) on February 8, 2002 cautioned members about the auditor independence rules recently released by the General Accounting Office (GAO). The notice said the GAO’s rules impose tighter restrictions on nonaudit services than the current AICPA’s audit standards. It also said the GAO’s final rules have changed significantly from an earlier exposure draft, and it is concerned these rules might lead to confusion and compliance problems.

Fact Sheet and Comparison

To help minimize any confusion, the AICPA has prepared a fact sheet explaining the types of entities affected and nonaudit services restricted under the GAO’s new rules.

  • Affected entities. The affected entities range from federal, state and local governments to recipients of governmental grant and loan assistance, including colleges, universities, charitable organizations, and small businesses with SBA loans.
  • Types of nonaudit services. The prohibited nonaudit services include basic bookkeeping, human resource services, information technology services, and indirect cost proposal or cost allocation plans. Other nonaudit services, (e.g., payroll services, tax services, and appraisal or valuation services), are allowed subject to certain “overarching principles.” A separate document provides a side-by-side comparison of GAO’s rules with AICPA’s for each type of service.

Implementation Guidance

The AICPA is also compiling a list of issues and questions to be addressed in implementation guidance. In its member notice, AICPA said it feels strongly that implementation guidance is needed to help overcome: (1) A lack of clarity that might otherwise confuse preparers, auditors, and the public, and (2) Uncertainties involving interpretations that could impede uniform implementation of the rules and create compliance problems for both auditors and preparers of financial statements.

The notice, which was signed by AICPA Chairman James G. Castellano and President Barry C. Melancon, said the Institute had voiced its concerns to GAO. “We were relentless in our efforts and these efforts were significant and continuous, even up until the day before the rule’s release.”

GAO’s independence rules are effective for periods beginning on or after October 1, 2002. To submit an issue or question to AICPA for inclusion in the implementation guidance, send it to

-Rosemary Schlank

You may like these other stories...

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) on Tuesday adopted a new auditing standard and amendments in three areas of the audit that could pose an increased risk of material misstatement in company financial...
Read more from Larry Perry here and in the Today’s World of Audits archive.In my last article, I presented an overview of one of the first steps in the preplanning phase of an audit engagement: reviewing prior year...
Read more from Larry Perry here and in the Today’s World of Audits archive.AU-C Section 800, Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (SPFs),...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Oct 22This webinar will include discussions of important issues in AU-C 800, Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks.
Oct 23Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.
Oct 30Many Excel users have a love-hate relationship with workbook links.
Nov 5Join CPA thought leader and peer reviewer Rob Cameron and learn ways to improve the outcome of your peer reviews while maximizing the value of your engagement workflow.