AICPA backs tax planning patent legislation
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) applauded the introduction by Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA), with co-sponsors Reps. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and Steve Chabot (R-OH), of H.R. 2365, legislation that would limit damages and other legal remedies available to holders of patents for tax planning methods.
“Tax strategy patents may make it impossible for the U.S. Tax Code to be applied equally to all taxpayers,” said Barry C. Melancon, AICPA President and CEO. “We want to thank Reps. Boucher, Goodlatte and Chabot for clearly seeing the threat and for their leadership in introducing legislation that would protect taxpayers and tax practitioners from infringement when they use patents that have been granted for tax planning methods.”
“With 60 tax strategy patents already granted and 86 applications pending, this is a growing problem. The patents do not pertain to just esoteric portions of the tax code affecting a handful of taxpayers; the patents cover a broad range of areas, including estate and gift tax, pension plans, tax-deferred exchanges and deferred compensation, that affect millions of taxpayers,” Melancon said.
Melancon noted that tax preparation software is exempt from H.R. 2365’s limits on damages and remedies for patents on tax planning methods.
The AICPA opposes tax strategy patents because they:
1. Violate the core principle of equity that under girds the entire tax system—namely, that people in similar situations ought to pay a similar amount of taxes;
2. May cause some taxpayers to pay more tax than Congress intended;
3. Complicate the provision of tax advice by professionals;
4. Make compliance by taxpayers more difficult; and
5. Mislead taxpayers into believing that a patented strategy is valid under the tax law.
The three senior members of the House Judiciary Committee introduced the bill on May 17. H.R. 2365 was referred to the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over patent issues.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.