The 3Cs of Fraudulent Financial Reporting

Faced with changes in business ethics and environments, auditors are being called upon to step up to a new standard of fraud detection. One way to facilitate discussions and communications in this area is to use the 3Cs model. The 3Cs represent broad categories of reasons why fraudulent financial reporting occurs.

Explanations of the 3Cs and how to use the model are provided in an article in the current issue of "The Internal Auditor." Highlights:

  • Conditions. Conditions are the motivations and pressures to engage in financial statement fraud. In recent accounting scandals, these conditions have included pressures on corporations to meet analysts' earnings forecasts. Executives committed illegal actions to mislead users of financial statements about poor or less-than-favorable financial performance.

  • Corporate structure. An organization's corporate structure can create an environment that increases the likelihood that fraudulent financial reporting will occur. Attributes of the corporate structure most likely to be associated with financial statement fraud are aggressiveness, arrogance, cohesiveness, loyalty, blind trust, control ineffectiveness, and gamesmanship.
  • Choice. Management is more likely to choose to engage in financial statement fraud when: 1) its personal wealth is closely tied to the company's performance through pay-for-performance plans, 2) management is willing to take personal risks, including the risks of civil or criminal penalties, for corporate benefit, 3) there are opportunities to commit financial statement fraud, 4) there is substantial internal and external pressure to create or maximize shareholder value, and 5) the probability of the fraud being detected is perceived to be very low.

To use the model, auditors can look for "business red flags," (i.e., conditions and circumstances that arise from the perceived need to overcome financial difficulties, such as the inability to meet analysts' forecasts, increased competition, and cash flow shortages), and then advise their clients on steps that can be taken to help eliminate motives and opportunities to engage in fraud.

"The Internal Auditor" is published by The Institute of Internal Auditors.

You may like these other stories...

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) on Tuesday adopted a new auditing standard and amendments in three areas of the audit that could pose an increased risk of material misstatement in company financial...
Read more from Larry Perry here and in the Today’s World of Audits archive.In my last article, I presented an overview of one of the first steps in the preplanning phase of an audit engagement: reviewing prior year...
Read more from Larry Perry here and in the Today’s World of Audits archive.AU-C Section 800, Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (SPFs),...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Aug 26
This webcast will include discussions of recently issued, commonly-applicable Accounting Standards Updates for non-public, non-governmental entities.
Aug 28
Excel spreadsheets are often akin to the American Wild West, where users can input anything they want into any worksheet cell. Excel's Data Validation feature allows you to restrict user inputs to selected choices, but there are many nuances to the feature that often trip users up.
Sep 9
In this session we'll discuss the types of technologies and their uses in a small accounting firm office.
Sep 11
This webcast will include discussions of commonly-applicable Clarified Auditing Standards for audits of non-public, non-governmental entities.