California Sues H&R Block over “Instant” Tax Refunds
| Easy & Profitable Client Payroll with PayCycle|
Now is a great time to get clients set up for payroll. We’d like to invite you to a FREE 60-minute web seminar sponsored by PayCycle, the leader in on-demand payroll. During this informative session, you’ll discover how to:
All PayCycle webinar attendees will receive 1 month free on PayCycle’s service. After the free period, PayCycle costs just $14.99 per client per month for the first 5 employees. Each additional employee is just $0.25 per month. This low monthly fee includes everything you need to process payroll, including a firm-branded website for clients, direct deposit, electronic tax payments and filings, seamless integration with QuickBooks, ATX, CCH and other leading accounting software, free customer support with payroll experts, customized marketing resources to solicit your payroll service to clients, and much more.
Interest rates charged on the loans could run as high as 100 percent over the course of a year, the suit alleges. “In marketing and selling these expensive loans, H&R Block has profited greatly, but deceived customers, violated their privacy rights and taken money from California families who can least afford it,” Lockyer said.
H&R Block has sold more that 1.5 million refund anticipation loans in California since 2001, Tom Dressler, a spokesman for the attorney general, said in a Reuters report, and about 70 percent of the loans went to low-income families. The California suit seeks compensation for H&R Block clients and a $20 million fine.
H&R Block said it would fight the suit. Spokesperson Linda McDougall said that H&R Block charged the same tax preparation fees for everyone, based on the complexity of the returns. Interest expenses on the loans are paid when the IRS issues the refund, she said, the Sacramento Bee reported, usually within two weeks if the return is filed electronically,.
The suit lacks merit, H&R Block claims in a press release, because it focuses on the cross-collection practices of the lender, which are governed by federal and not state laws. The suit alleges that Block does not tell clients that any previous years’ unpaid refund fees may be deducted, along with current fees, kansascity.com says.
Defending its procedures in the press release the company says, “Client disclosures go into great detail to describe other, lower-cost tax filing options, explain the cost of the loans, and advise clients that cross collection would occur on such prior debts. The word “loan” appears on each page of the bank’s loan application in letters two inches high, and also is very clearly used in all of the product’s advertising.”
Block settled four class-action lawsuits over the loans in December by agreeing to pay $62.5 million.