Pooling Issue Heats Up
Although FASB is willing to listen to corporations, the organization remains unimpressed with current suggestions. The rulemaking body’s focus is on ending the abuse that accompanies pooling for those companies looking to increase company value during a merger.
Accounting professionals argue that pooling should be kept for all-stock deals where the two merging companies are approximately the same size. FASB remains unfazed by the many suggestions that have come out of the recent New York and San Francisco hearings.
"Even though we've been trying, I don't think I've personally heard anything that provides us with a basis to make a distinction [for mergers of equals] yet," FASB Chairman Edmund L. Jenkins said during a break in the proceedings.
It is unlikely that the Board will change its mind. Under current guidelines, an acquirer must meet a dozen strict criteria before it is able to use pooling. However, several companies last year weren’t stopped from employing the method. The Board fears that if pooling is an option, it will become a “one size fits all” solution for companies “squeezing” into the criteria.