a Sift Media publication

Free Downloads
Check out our library of free whitepapers available for immediate download

IBM, PwC Consulting Agree to Terms of Acquisition

There was a time when PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) entertained the idea of receiving $18 billion from Hewlett-Packard for the acquisition of its consulting division. Just before the deal became final, HP pulled out. That was nearly two years ago, and a lot has changed in the world economy since then. Yesterday, IBM and PwC announced plans for the acquisition of PwC Consulting for a price tag of $3.5 billion - a far cry from the amount under consideration in the past.

"Amazing how things change, isn't it?," said Tom Rodenhauser, president of Consulting Information Services in Keene, New Hampshire. "It's a steal for IBM.... It was overinflated in October 2000. PwC was trying to get this price at the time, but didn't."

Analysts http://www.accountingweb.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=87372 " target="_blank">had expected the acquisition to cost in the neighborhood of $5-7 billion instead of the final agreement of $3.5 billion. PwC CEO Samuel DiPiazza said he was happy with the price.

Just two weeks ago, PwC was still courting offers from HP. "We declined the same opportunity just a couple of weeks ago," http://news.com.com/2100-1001-947283.html?tag=fd_lede " target="_blank">said Juergen Rottler, a vice president of marketing, strategy, and alliances for HP.

The acquisition has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies, but finalization is pending while the firms wait for regulatory approval from the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as acceptance by the PwC partnership. It is expected that the deal will close in the third quarter of this year. IBM expects to see an immediate improvement in revenues as a result of the acquisition.

IBM will merge the consultancy into its Business Innovation Services unit of IBM Global Services. The name Monday, which was chosen by PwC as the new brand for the consultancy when the firm was contemplating taking the company public, will not be used by IBM.

Independency is a Joke

How could PwC be allowed to do a deal with an audit client, IBM, for $ 3.5 billion, and still be allowed to audit IBM?

How can PwC be objective in giving its opinion on the value of assets and goodwill in IBM's balance sheet after this transaction?

Or is "only" $ 3.5 billion considered not material in the balance sheet of IBM?

How can PwC be considered independent when 30% of its former partners become directors of its audit client?

Enron was only a minor scandal compared to this!

Create your free account

  • Access all articles in full
  • View multimedia
  • Receive email bulletins
  • Private messaging
Register now

Login

Forgotten your password?