a Sift Media publication

Free Downloads
Check out our library of free whitepapers available for immediate download

AICPA Statement on New Auditor Independence Position

The following is the text of an e-mail distributed to AICPA members on Friday, February 1, 2002 outlining the change in position where the AICPA now opposes the practice of a firm providing certain kinds of consulting and internal audit services to a public client which the firm audits. It outlines the plans for a significant public relations campaign in the next few weeks, and includes the commitment to go forward with the student outreach campaign without delay.


Dear AICPA Member,

Our profession enjoys a sacred public trust and for more than one hundred years has served the public interest. Yet, in a short period of time the stain from Enron's collapse has eroded our most important asset: public confidence.

For the last two weeks, we have been working around the clock to improve the perception of the accounting profession. During this period we have been called upon to speak for the profession in literally scores of broadcast and print interviews. We have communicated our zero tolerance of violations of the ethics and standards of our profession, which tarnish us all. And we are attempting to focus scrutiny on where we believe the most basic problem lies - the current and outdated financial reporting model and the accounting principles that surround it.

What our observations of the current debate have driven home to us is that because scope of services has become such an issue, it must be addressed before the real issues will ever be considered. For that reason, your Board approved a resolution to support prohibitions on auditors of public companies from providing financial systems design and implementation and internal audit outsourcing in order to restore the public's confidence in the financial reporting system. While necessary to restore the public confidence, the Board does not believe that prohibiting non-audit services will improve the quality of audits nor prevent business failures. We will therefore continue to work on substantive improvements to the financial reporting and regulatory process.

To this end, we have already begun to focus others on the benefits that will accrue from a reporting model that is suitable to Information Age companies, whose earning assets are often not accurately valued by traditional, manufacturing-based measures.

We will work with the SEC to strengthen regulation of the profession as it implements a system that incorporates active public participation to enhance discipline and quality monitoring.

We will continue to marshal support for moving from rules-based to principles-based accounting.

Finally, we will focus attention on addressing inherent inequities in the auditing process, for example, that it is a felony to lie to a prosecutor, but not to one's auditor.

Let us reaffirm and be perfectly clear that the Board recognizes that the reporting needs of private companies and their auditors are very different and should not be subjected to the same restrictions on non-audit services. It is the tradition of CPAs throughout the U.S. to provide a range of services including audit, tax, business advisory and information technology, to their privately held clients.

In the coming weeks, you will see advertisements in The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post and USA Today that we believe will begin the process of restoring confidence. We will not delay launching our student website and recruiting efforts, as our integrated marketing consultants advise us that the profession's heightened visibility makes this an opportune time to convey our messages regarding its viability, dynamism and high standards. We will use every communications vehicle at our disposal, including mail, e-mail, our website, CPA Letter and Journal of Accountancy, to keep you apprised of developments and to provide you with the information that you need.

This has been a difficult time for all of us, but we look forward to restored public confidence in our profession. As always, please feel free to contact us with your comments and suggestions.

Yours sincerely,


James G. Castellano, CPA
Chair of the Board

Barry C. Melancon, CPA
President and CEO

It is not about rules based ....

It is simply about what your befinition of the phrase "in our opinon fairly presents" means. Berardino from AA seems to thinks that because Enron was technically within the rules (a questionable judgement at best) his firm was required to give them an unqualified opinion.

Nothing prevents AA from refusing to issue such an opinon and resigning the audit if necessary. Frankly, given the prevailing opinion at AA, I think that nothing less than a suspension of AA's SEC practice for a year will suffice to serve the profession.

Do the Right things . . . . Right - Integrity

A quote from Stephen Covey, " While we are free to choose our actions, we are not free to choose the consequences of those actions. Consequences are governed by natural law."

CPA's are financial planners and advisors by nature.

For too long the focus of most in the accounting industry has been on what additional services (financial planning, investment advise and sales, insurance product sales, personnel services, etc) can we do to increase our revenues. This thought process is somewhat of a carryover from the "What's in it for ME" generation.

The focus should not be on the dollars. The focus should be always on DOING THE RIGHT THINGS ... RIGHT. As I have been taught, PROFIT ... is the result of doing the right things right, because you will be sought out.

Will Rogers said, "Let advertisers spend the same amount of money improving the product that they do on advertising and they wouldn't have to advertise it." Maybe the AICPA and the accounting industry need to re-visit the approach of better industry-regulated oversight of the "Big" auditors and less may need to be spent to advertise to regain the loss of trust that has splashed up on each of us in the CPA profession.

Lost focus

Well, some of the profession has sort of been pre-occupied with global business credentials.

non cpa minority partners

isn't it interesting how the decline of trust coincides with the decision to allow non-cpas as minority partners of cpa firms?

Create your free account

  • Access all articles in full
  • View multimedia
  • Receive email bulletins
  • Private messaging
Register now

Login

Forgotten your password?