Are We At an Awkward Stage about Age?
By Phyllis Weiss Haserot
Whether or not 60 is the new 40, or 30 is the new 20, etc., age perceptions and realities are confusing and not aligned with perceptions and realities of decades ago. We are in need of mindset transitioning.
What defines a person’s age? How old are co-workers, employees, and managers really, beyond just chronological age? A thoughtful list of options on ways to define and measure the ages of members of a workforce (The Prism of Age) appears in an Executive Summary by Sloan Center on Aging and Work (March 2010).
- Chronological age – time in years since birth with connotations of age related individual human development (physical, social, emotional, etc.).
- Career stage or Occupational age – a way of thinking about experiences that mark the accumulation of knowledge, competencies, skills, and social capital related to a particular type of career or line of work.
- Life Events age – an individual’s development as s/he moves through life cycle experiences (e.g. events and transitions such as marriage, birth of children).
- Generational age – the social, economic, political, and cultural influences that have a sustained impact on the way large groups of people see the world and make meaning out of these experiences.
- Organizational age or Tenure – the number of years an individual has been with a particular employer or the number of years the person has been in a particular job or profession.
- Subjective age – an individual’s sense of his or her own age. I would include under this:
- Relative age – how old a person feels comparatively in a group setting, team
- Social age – how old society perceives one to be
- Physical age – relative to health impact on ability to carry out daily tasks (work and personal)
- Traditionalists born 1925-1942
- Baby Boomers born 1943-1962
- Generation X born 1963-1978
- Generation Y/Millennials born 1979-1998 (under age 30 today)
Each of these age options is important and has greater or lesser relevance in different circumstances. Employers, recruiters, fundraisers, financial advisers, and individuals assessing their own situations need to think more flexibly and creatively about the ramifications (plusses and minuses) of each of these types of ages and free themselves of stereotypes associated with both young and older chronological age.
Thinking about different “ages” may require re-thinking of traditional compensation progression and schemes as well as positioning and titles. This is likely to meet resistance from policy-makers who resist the pain of mapping and achieving change and rocking a boat that has buoyed their careers. Not easy, but let’s get real and mount the dialogue.
What changes in your thinking about the value of individuals and employees do these definitions provoke?
© Phyllis Weiss Haserot, 2011.
Phyllis Weiss Haserot is the Cross-Generational Voice and the president of Practice Development Counsel, a business development and organizational effectiveness consulting and coaching firm she founded over 20 years, A special focus is on the profitability of improving workplace inter-generational relations as well as transitioning planning for baby boomer senior partners (www.nextgeneration-nextdestination.com ). Phyllis is the author of The Rainmaking Machine" and “The Marketer’s Handbook of Tips & Checklists” (both Thomson Reuters/West 2011). firstname.lastname@example.org. URL: www.pdcounsel.com