Study evaluates the causes of restatements, with interesting conclusions.

Share this content

By Dave Tate, CPA, Esq. - An interesting new study evaluates the causes of financial statement restatements: clickable text link to study. If I read the report correctly, the study supports a conclusion that fraud (manipulation) is not one of the major causes of restatement. The major causes are "internal error" (basic internal company errors unrelated to the accounting standards) at 57%, and "standards" (most often due to the lack of clarity in applying the standards and/or the proliferation of the literature due to the lack of clarity in the original standard) at 37%. Restatement due to "manipulation" and "complexity" are ranked at only 3% each. Of course, "internal error" and "standards" both could be due to manipulation. The study also does not evaluate the percent of restatement caused by other factors that could be present, such as inadequate internal control.

I also found the percent of account type resulting in restatement to be interesting. The study lists the largest contributors as "expense" at 21%, "equity" at 19%, "misclassifications" at 16%, "revenue recognition" at 10%, and "acquisitions/investments" at 8%. I would have expected "revenue recognition" to be in line with "expense."

Dave Tate (click on the updated audit committee guide link)
mailto:[email protected]


Please login or register to join the discussion.

There are currently no replies, be the first to post a reply.