Paragraph 9 of the FSP “amends paragraph 11(d) of FAS 142 so that a company will use its own assumptions about renewal or extension of an arrangement, adjusted for the company-specific factors in paragraph 11, even when there is likely to be substantial cost or material modifications.”
The FSP also states that there might continue to be a difference between the estimated useful life of the intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows under FAS 141R. It states that this could be due to different assumptions held by the company than a market participant would hold. This situation is considered appropriate because amortization of an intangible asset should reflect the period over which the asset will contribute both directly and indirectly to the expected future cash flows of the company.
Basically this FSP is recognizing that the assumptions used to estimate the useful life are different than the assumptions used to calculate fair value and that a company should use their own assumptions and not a market participant.
Three new disclosures were added with this FSP:
1. The company’s accounting policy on the treatment of costs incurred to renew or extend the term of a recognized intangible asset.
2. In the period of acquisition or renewal, the weighted-average period prior to the next renewal or extension (both explicit and implicit) by major intangible asset class.
3. For an company that capitalizes renewal or extension costs, the total amount of costs incurred in the period to renew or extend the term or a recognized intangible asset for each period for which an income statement is presented, by major intangible asset class.
Good Luck and if you need some examples, look up this FSP on the FASB website at www.fasb.org.