|
|
BDO Seidman Nears End of Case Involving Criminal Charges Federal officials have charged that BDO knew, but did not report to the Internal Revenue Service, that an investment adviser client had misappropriated $65 million from his clients. Curiously, this might well have been the charge the jury was thinking of when it convicted Andersen of obstruction of justice. In a strange twist of fate, Andersen's jury found no evidence of the alleged illegal destruction of documents but instead convicted the firm for editing an internal memo so it would be more accurate and would not be erroneously construed as concealing an illegal act. The Times reports other similarities to the Enron/Andersen case:
BDO avoided being banned by the Securities and Exchange Commission from auditing publicly traded companies through a pretrial agreement. In April 2002, BDO agreed to make a $16 million contribution to settle the charges. BDO's outside counsel explains, "Once BDO makes restitution, the charges are withdrawn and there's no criminal record." An official at the SEC, who would not speak for attribution, told the Times that without a permanent criminal charge, the firm could continue to audit public companies. ("Audit Firm Survives Criminal Charge, $16 million later," New York Times, June 22, 2002.) A spokesperson for BDO Seidman clarified that, "The investigation did not result in a single allegation against any current partners or employees of BDO Seidman... We believe BDO Seidman has the best litigation record of any national accounting firm." AccountingWEB.com Jun-24-2002 Categories: Firms, Government, News Archives Times read: 4563
|
|
|||||||||||