Proposed Statement on Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 141(R) | AccountingWEB

Proposed Statement on Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 141(R)

By Linda Cavanaugh, CPA - I am really far behind in my reading and I thought I would just give you a quick update on what is going on in the FASB realm. This proposed Statement is being issued due to concerns expressed by financial statement users that current disclosures on loss contingencies are not adequate. The concern is partly over quantitative disclosures and the “overuse” of the “not estimatable” criteria. Investors stated “they prefer to have a highly uncertain estimate supplemented with a qualitative description than no quantification of a potential loss as commonly occurs in existing practice (paragraph A16). This proposed Statement would expand the current disclosures and will result in a larger pool of contingencies being disclosed.

Paragraph 3 of the proposed Statement states that it is applicable for all loss contingencies that are within the scope of FAS 5 or FAS 141(R), except for the following:

1.Asset impairments

2.Guarantees within the scope of FIN 45 “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”

3.Unpaid claim costs or reinsurance contracts within the scope of FASB Statements 60, 97, 113, 120 or 163

4. Insurance-related assessments within the scope of SOP 97-3 “Accounting by Insurance and Other Enterprises for Insurance-Related Assessments”

5.Employment-related costs including pensions and other post employment benefits, except for withdrawal from a multi-employer plan

Under paragraph 5 a loss contingency does not have to be disclosed if:

1.An entity has made an assessment and determined that the likelihood of a loss is remote.
2.An unasserted claim or assessment in which there has been no manifestation by a potential claimant of an awareness of a possible claim or assessment unless:
a. It is probable that a claim will be asserted
b. The likelihood of a loss, if the claim were to be asserted, is more than remote.

However, under paragraph 6, even if the likelihood of a loss is remote, the loss contingency should still be disclosed if it is expected to be resolved within one year from the date of the financial statements or if the loss would have such a severe impact on the entity that it would cause a significant financial disruptive effect on the normal functioning of the entity.

Per paragraph 7, the following items are to be disclosed for loss contingencies that fall under the above paragraphs. The disclosures may be aggregated by the nature of the loss contingency (i.e. product liability).

1. The amount of the claim or assessment against the entity or if there is no claim or assessment amount, the entity’s best estimate of the maximum exposure to the loss. An entity may also disclose (but is not required) its best estimate of the possible loss or range of loss if the amount of the claim or the estimated maximum exposure is not representative of the entity’s actual exposure. These amounts should include any amount already recognized in the financial statement and exclude potential recoveries.

2. A description of the contingency, how it arose, its legal or contractual basis, its current status, the anticipated timing of its resolution, factors that are likely to affect the ultimate outcome and their potential effect on the outcome, the most likely outcome, significant assumptions concerning the estimate of amounts disclosed and in assessing the most likely outcome.

3. Any relevant insurance or indemnification arrangements that could lead to a recovery of some or all of the possible loss.

Per paragraphs 8 and 9, for loss contingencies recognized in the financial statements a tabular reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances must be disclosed.

2010 2009 2008
Beginning Balance

Increases for loss
contingencies recognized
during the period

Increases resulting from
changes in estimates of
the amounts of loss
contingencies previously

Decreases resulting from
changes in estimates or
de-recognition of loss
contingencies previously

Decreases resulting from
cash payments (or other
forms of settlement) for
loss contingencies

Ending Balance

An entity should also disclose the total amount of recoveries from insurance or indemnification arrangements recognized in each statement of financial position or statement of income presented that are related to the loss contingencies included in the above table.

The table disclosures are to be on a prospective basis and prior year comparisons do not need to be included for 2008 and 2009. (one year in 2008, two years in 2009, and three years in 2010 and beyond)

Per paragraph 10, a Type II subsequent event (occurs after reporting period but before financial statements are filed) should be disclosed pursuant to paragraph 7. If the loss contingency can be reasonably estimated, pro forma financial data may be provided as if the loss had occurred at the date of the financial statements.

Paragraph 11 gives an exemption from disclosure for information that is prejudicial, such as in pending or threatened litigation. If the information to be disclosed is considered to be prejudicial, then the entity may aggregate the disclosures required by paragraph 7 at a higher level such that the information is no longer prejudicial.

If the information is still prejudicial after aggregation, then the entity is not required to disclose the most likely outcome; significant assumptions concerning the estimate of amounts disclosed and in assessing the most likely outcome; or any insurance recoveries or indemnification arrangements. The other disclosures in paragraph 7 still need to be disclosed. This will be considered a rare event, but the FASB states that rare does not mean never.

If approved, this Statement would be effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008 (i.e. the 2008 10K).

Stay tuned to see what changes take place over the next couple of months.

This blog

Linda is a CPA living in Southwestern Ohio, working as a research accountant for an investor-owned publicly traded utility company. She specializes in implementing new FASB and SEC requirements and FAS 133 derivative issues. In her role at the utility she has encountered many issues and written many memos, so send in your implementation and derivative issues and Linda will help figure out an answer.

More from this blog

Bloggers crew

Steve Knowles has spent 25 years in business and practice in the UK, but he also worked in the states and the years haven't dulled his way of seeing an alternative view to everyone else, and every day is a new adventure.


Joel M. Ungar, CPA is a lifelong resident of the Detroit area and a graduate of The University of Michigan. He is a principal with Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, a Top 15 auditor of SEC public reporting companies.


Allan Boress, CPA, with over 25 years as a practitioner and consultant to the accounting profession. Mr. Boress is the author of 12 published books in 6 different languages, including a best-seller, The "I-Hate-Selling" Book.


Larry Perry, CPA, CPA Firm Support Services, LLC, is the author of accounting and auditing manuals, author and presenter of live staff training seminars, and author of webcast and self-study CPE programs. He blogs about small audits, reviews, and compilations.

Sandra Wiley, COO and Shareholder, is ranked by Accounting Today as one of the 100 Most Influential People in Accounting as a result of her prominent role as an industry expert on HR and training as well as influence as a management and planning consultant. She is also a founding member of The CPA Consultant's Alliance. Sandra is a certified Kolbe™ trainer who advises firms on building balanced teams, managing employee conflict and hiring staff.

Maria Calabrese, CIR, Human Resources manager for Fazio, Mannuzza, Roche, Tankel, LaPilusa, LLC in Cranford, New Jersey, Maria's topics revolve around the world of: Mentoring, Performance management, and The "Y Generation," a.k.a. "The whY generation".


William Brighenti is a CPA, Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor, and Certified [Business] Valuation Analyst, operating an accounting, tax, and QuickBooks consulting firm in Hartford, Connecticut, Accountants CPA Hartford.


Ken Garen, CPA, is the co-founder and President of Universal Business Computing Company (, a software development firm of high-volume, high-productivity accounting and payroll technology.


Eva Rosenberg, MBA, EA, is the publisher of, and author of the weekly syndicated Ask TaxMama column. She provides answers to tax questions from taxpayers and tax professionals worldwide.


Amy Vetter, CPA, CITP is the CPA Programs Leader for Intacct Corporation responsible for leading the CPA/BPO Partners nationally.

Brian Strahle is the owner of LEVERAGE SALT, LLC where he provides state and local tax technical services to accounting firms, law firms and tax research organizations across the United States. He also writes a weekly column in Tax Analysts State tax Notes entitled, "The SALT Effect." For more info, visit his website:
Scott H. Cytron, ABC, is president of Cytron and Company, known for helping companies and organizations improve their bottom line through a hybrid of strategic public relations, communications, marketing programs and top-notch client service. An accredited consultant, Scott works with companies, organizations and individuals in professional services (accounting, finance, medical, legal, engineering), high-tech and B2B/B2C product/service sales.

Rita Keller is a nationally known CPA firm management consultant, speaker, author, mentor and blogger. She has over 30 years hands-on experience in CPA firm management, marketing, technology and administrative operations.

Stacy Kildal is the mom of two fantastic kids, an Advanced Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor, Certified Enterprise Solutions ProAdvisor, Sleeter Group Certified Consultant, a nationally recognized member of the Intuit Trainer and Writer Network, and co-host of RadioFree QuickBooks.
Michael Alter's blog specializes in providing practical advice to those who seek greater profitability and practice management tactics that enhance deeper client relationships.

Sally Glick, CMO, Principal, Marketer of the Year in 2003 and AAM Hall of Famer in 2007, leads a lively discussion of the constantly expanding roles of marketing and the professional marketers that drive this initiative in accounting firms of all sizes.


The IMA Young Professionals Blog features the insights of IMA’s Young Professionals Committee. Committee members share advice and experiences on careers, continuing education, work/life balance, and other issues affecting young accounting and finance professionals.


FEI Financial Reporting Blog provides highlights from SEC, PCAOB, FASB, IASB, and other regulatory news, including reporting under Sarbanes-Oxley Sect 404. It is written by Edith Orenstein, Director of Technical Policy Analysis at FEI.


Sue Anderson has 30 years of experience in continuing education for accountants. Currently she is the program director for online CPE provider CPE Link.


Jim Fahey is COO of Apple Growth Partners, a regional CPA firm in Ohio. His focus is on the effective and efficient use of technology within the firm by all team members.

Caleb Newquist is the Editor-in-Chief of Sift Media US, overseeing content for both AccountingWEB and Going Concern.

Leita Hart-Fanta, CPA, CGFM, and CGAP is the author of "The Yellow Book Interpreted" and owner of a website devoted to training for governmental auditors.


AccountingWEB is more than just a U.S. team of journalists and financial and technology experts - we have an international side, too! Members of our British team who publish share their ideas, insights, and perspectives from across the pond.