FAS 141R - Business Combinations | AccountingWEB

FAS 141R - Business Combinations

By Linda Cavanaugh, CPA - This new Statement was a lot more involved than I thought at first glance. Here is the first installment.

FAS 141R –"Business Combinations" was issued to improve relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability of the information surrounding business combinations.

The first step to applying this Statement is to determine whether a transaction is a business combination by applying the definition in Paragraph 3. FAS 141R defines a business combination as a transaction or other event in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses. This includes a merger of equals.

A business is defined as an integrated set of activities and assets that is capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return in the form of dividends, lower costs, or other economic benefits directly to investors or other owners, members, or participants. The entity does not have to be producing outputs; it just has to be capable of producing outputs. This definition does not include joint ventures, acquisition of an asset or a group of assets, a combination between entities under common control, or a combination between not-for-profit organizations or the acquisition of a for-profit business by a non-profit.

A developmental stage entity may not have outputs and other factors need to be assessed to determine whether the developmental stage entity is a business. The factors include but are not limited to, whether the set: 1) has begun planned principal activities, 2) has employees, intellectual property, and other inputs and processes that could be applied to those inputs, 3) is pursuing a plan to produce outputs, and 4) will be able to obtain access to customers that will purchase the outputs.

This definition will cause more entities to be classified as businesses and be subjected to the guidance in this Statement.

As with FAS 141, the acquisition method is used to account for the business combination. To apply the acquisition method an entity must 1) identify the acquirer, 2) determine the acquisition date, 3) recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, and 4) recognize and measure goodwill or gain from a bargain purchase (negative goodwill).

1) Identify the acquirer.

The guidance in ARB 51 as amended is used to identify the acquirer and paragraphs A11-A15 are to be used if ARB 51 does not clearly indicate who the acquiring party is. However, if the entity being combined is a variable interest entity under FIN 46, then the primary beneficiary is always the acquirer.

ARB 51 says that the acquirer is the entity that has ownership of the majority voting interest or over 50% of the outstanding voting shares.

Other factors to be considered in determining the acquirer include: the relative voting rights in the combined entity after the business combination, the existence of a large minority voting interest, the composition of the governing body, the composition of the senior management, or the terms of exchange of equity interests.

2) Determine the acquisition date.

The acquisition date is the date that the acquirer obtains control of the acquiree and is not necessarily the traditional closing date. For example if a written contract provides for a change of control before the consideration is legally transferred.

3) Recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree.

This is where most of the revisions took place.

An asset or liability must meet the definition in Concept Statement 6 to be recognized as an identifiable asset or liability in the acquisition. Expected future costs to exit an activity, to terminate employees, or relocate employees are no longer recognized as part of the acquisition costs. These costs are to be recognized per other applicable GAAP.

If there is a pre-existing arrangement or other arrangement before or during negotiations these arrangements are not considered part of the business combination transaction and are accounted for under other applicable GAAP.

A transaction for the benefit of the acquirer is likely to be a separate transaction, such as

1. a transaction that in effect settles pre-existing relationships between the acquirer and acquiree (more guidance in paragraphs A78-A85)
2. a transaction that compensates employees or former owners of the acquiree for future services (more guidance in paragraphs A86-A90)
3. a transaction that reimburses the acquiree or its former owners for paying the acquirer’s acquisition related costs.

The acquirer’s acquisition related costs are to be expensed in the period costs are incurred and benefits received. These costs may include advisory fees, legal, accounting, valuation, and the costs of registering debt or equity securities. The exception to this rule is the costs to issue debt and equity securities which are to be accounted for under other applicable GAAP.

Assets such as brand names, patents, or customer relationships that the acquiree could not recognize because it had developed them internally, could be recognized by the acquirer under the new guidelines.

Paragraphs A16-A56 provide additional guidance on recognizing leases and intangible assets acquired in a business combination.

At the acquisition date, the assets and liabilities need to be classified or designated according to other applicable GAAP, such as available for sale or trading under FAS 115. However, leases and certain insurance contracts are to be classified as of the contract date unless they are modified, then the modification date is used.

The assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest are to be measured at fair value using the guidance in FAS 157. This is a change from past guidance, where some items were measured at historical costs.

And of course there are exceptions and the following are not measured at fair value:

1. Assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
2. Income taxes
3. Employee benefits
4. Indemnification assets
5. Reacquired rights
6. Share-based payment awards
7. Assets held for sale

Each of the above are to measured in accordance with the guidance of the Statements that they currently fall under. (I.e. Share-based payment awards follow the guidance in FAS123R)

4.) Recognize and measure goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase (negative goodwill)

Goodwill is now measured as:

1. the consideration transferred (measured at fair value)
2. the fair value of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree
3. the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree (control achieved in stages)


1. the net of the acquisition date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed measured in accordance with this Statement.

If only equity interests are transferred, the fair value may be more reliably measured using the acquiree’s equity interests.

If no consideration is transferred, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer’s interest in the acquiree determined using a valuation technique in place of the acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred should be used.

When a bargain purchase is made, as in a forced sale, and the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities is greater than the consideration transferred, the acquirer must first re-assess whether it has correctly identified the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The acquirer must then re-assess the measurement of the identified assets and liabilities, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, any previously acquired interests in the acquiree, and the consideration transferred.

If the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities is still greater than the consideration transferred, then the acquirer is to recognize a gain for the difference on the acquisition date. This is different from previous guidance, where the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities would have been reduced by the difference.

That is the basic concept of FAS 141R. The main difference between the previous guidance and the new guidance is what is being measured and how it is being measured. FAS 141R has 7 appendices that provide further guidance on how to implement this new Statement.

Stay tuned to the same bat channel and the same bat time for further blogs on this issue.

This blog

Linda is a CPA living in Southwestern Ohio, working as a research accountant for an investor-owned publicly traded utility company. She specializes in implementing new FASB and SEC requirements and FAS 133 derivative issues. In her role at the utility she has encountered many issues and written many memos, so send in your implementation and derivative issues and Linda will help figure out an answer.

More from this blog

Bloggers crew

Steve Knowles has spent 25 years in business and practice in the UK, but he also worked in the states and the years haven't dulled his way of seeing an alternative view to everyone else, and every day is a new adventure.


Joel M. Ungar, CPA is a lifelong resident of the Detroit area and a graduate of The University of Michigan. He is a principal with Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, a Top 15 auditor of SEC public reporting companies.


Allan Boress, CPA, with over 25 years as a practitioner and consultant to the accounting profession. Mr. Boress is the author of 12 published books in 6 different languages, including a best-seller, The "I-Hate-Selling" Book.


Larry Perry, CPA, CPA Firm Support Services, LLC, is the author of accounting and auditing manuals, author and presenter of live staff training seminars, and author of webcast and self-study CPE programs. He blogs about small audits, reviews, and compilations.

Sandra Wiley, COO and Shareholder, is ranked by Accounting Today as one of the 100 Most Influential People in Accounting as a result of her prominent role as an industry expert on HR and training as well as influence as a management and planning consultant. She is also a founding member of The CPA Consultant's Alliance. Sandra is a certified Kolbe™ trainer who advises firms on building balanced teams, managing employee conflict and hiring staff.

Maria Calabrese, CIR, Human Resources manager for Fazio, Mannuzza, Roche, Tankel, LaPilusa, LLC in Cranford, New Jersey, Maria's topics revolve around the world of: Mentoring, Performance management, and The "Y Generation," a.k.a. "The whY generation".


William Brighenti is a CPA, Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor, and Certified [Business] Valuation Analyst, operating an accounting, tax, and QuickBooks consulting firm in Hartford, Connecticut, Accountants CPA Hartford.


Ken Garen, CPA, is the co-founder and President of Universal Business Computing Company (www.ubcc.com), a software development firm of high-volume, high-productivity accounting and payroll technology.


Eva Rosenberg, MBA, EA, is the publisher of TaxMama.com, and author of the weekly syndicated Ask TaxMama column. She provides answers to tax questions from taxpayers and tax professionals worldwide.


Amy Vetter, CPA, CITP is the CPA Programs Leader for Intacct Corporation responsible for leading the CPA/BPO Partners nationally.

Brian Strahle is the owner of LEVERAGE SALT, LLC where he provides state and local tax technical services to accounting firms, law firms and tax research organizations across the United States. He also writes a weekly column in Tax Analysts State tax Notes entitled, "The SALT Effect." For more info, visit his website: www.leveragestateandlocaltax.com
Scott H. Cytron, ABC, is president of Cytron and Company, known for helping companies and organizations improve their bottom line through a hybrid of strategic public relations, communications, marketing programs and top-notch client service. An accredited consultant, Scott works with companies, organizations and individuals in professional services (accounting, finance, medical, legal, engineering), high-tech and B2B/B2C product/service sales.

Rita Keller is a nationally known CPA firm management consultant, speaker, author, mentor and blogger. She has over 30 years hands-on experience in CPA firm management, marketing, technology and administrative operations.

Stacy Kildal is the mom of two fantastic kids, an Advanced Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor, Certified Enterprise Solutions ProAdvisor, Sleeter Group Certified Consultant, a nationally recognized member of the Intuit Trainer and Writer Network, and co-host of RadioFree QuickBooks.
Michael Alter's blog specializes in providing practical advice to those who seek greater profitability and practice management tactics that enhance deeper client relationships.

Sally Glick, CMO, Principal, Marketer of the Year in 2003 and AAM Hall of Famer in 2007, leads a lively discussion of the constantly expanding roles of marketing and the professional marketers that drive this initiative in accounting firms of all sizes.


The IMA Young Professionals Blog features the insights of IMA’s Young Professionals Committee. Committee members share advice and experiences on careers, continuing education, work/life balance, and other issues affecting young accounting and finance professionals.


FEI Financial Reporting Blog provides highlights from SEC, PCAOB, FASB, IASB, and other regulatory news, including reporting under Sarbanes-Oxley Sect 404. It is written by Edith Orenstein, Director of Technical Policy Analysis at FEI.


Sue Anderson has 30 years of experience in continuing education for accountants. Currently she is the program director for online CPE provider CPE Link.


Jim Fahey is COO of Apple Growth Partners, a regional CPA firm in Ohio. His focus is on the effective and efficient use of technology within the firm by all team members.

Caleb Newquist is the Editor-in-Chief of Sift Media US, overseeing content for both AccountingWEB and Going Concern.

Leita Hart-Fanta, CPA, CGFM, and CGAP is the author of "The Yellow Book Interpreted" and owner of Yellowbook-CPE.com a website devoted to training for governmental auditors.


AccountingWEB is more than just a U.S. team of journalists and financial and technology experts - we have an international side, too! Members of our British team who publish AccountingWEB.co.uk share their ideas, insights, and perspectives from across the pond.