Supreme Court Piles on Hefty Tax Shelter Penalty
by Terri Eyden on
By Ken Berry
In a new case decided by the US Supreme Court, the remnants of a tax shelter partially constructed by wily Texas billionaire Billy Joe McCombs - known informally as "Red" - collapsed like a house of cards (US v. Gary Woods, S. Ct. No. 12-562, December 3, 2013).
The highest court in the land unanimously ruled that San Antonio–based McCombs, former owner of the Minnesota Vikings NFL franchise, and his business partner Gary Woods, owe a whopping tax penalty to the IRS. The duo set up a partnership designed to shield an expected influx of income from tax. Based on court papers, McCombs and Woods sank $32 million into the deal.
This tax shelter is known as a "current options bring reward alternatives," or COBRA. Here's how the COBRA shelter reduced the tax bite: When calculating their basis in the partnership interests, McCombs and Woods considered only the "long" component of various currency-option spreads and disregarded the nearly offsetting "short" component. Subsequently, when the assets were disposed of for modest gains, the two moguls claimed they were entitled to losses of more than $45 million.
The partnership was found to be a sham by the lower courts, but McCombs didn't meekly accept his fate. He and Woods argued that they shouldn't be on the hook for a 40 percent penalty in addition to the regular tax liability.
According to Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the opinion, the taxpayers failed to impress the top court. "At the end of the day, Woods' and McCombs' $3.2 million investment generated tax losses that, if treated as valid, could have shielded more than $45 million of income from taxation," he said.
Because there were no valid partnerships for tax purposes, the IRS determined that the partners could not claim a basis for their partnership interests greater than zero and that any resulting tax underpayments are subject to a 40 percent penalty for gross valuation misstatements. In the final analysis, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court and upheld the extra assessment. "The penalty is applicable to tax underpayments resulting from the partners' participation in the COBRA tax shelter," wrote Scalia.
It isn't yet clear how much the penalty will amount to, but it's expected to run well into the millions. The IRS still has to figure out the interest calculation.
As of this writing, neither McCombs nor Woods has responded publicly to the ruling. However, experts are calling the decision a clear win for the IRS and a severe blow to taxpayers. Fighting the 40 percent penalty will likely be an uphill battle in future cases.
You may like these other stories...
Lois Lerner isn’t a Superwoman, but she’s showing at least as much resilience as Lois Lane.A new report released on March 11 by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, one of several government...
Each tax-filing season poses different challenges for small business owners – from understanding the new tax laws and regulations to preparing new forms and disclosures.But according to Kevin Anderson and Doug Bekker,...
In Denver, state legislators are probably thinking, "Why didn't we think of this earlier?" The state of Colorado's retail marijuana sales (separate from medical marijuana sales) in January alone generated...
Upcoming CPE Webinars
BAR is an acronym for: Boundaries, Authority and Role. This simple tool will provide participants with a solid understanding of leadership essentials to improve their performance.
This material is designed to provide a start-to-finish overview of how to plan and complete high-quality small audits efficiently.
In this session Excel expert David H. Ringstrom, CPA shares numerous techniques that you can use to work with charts more efficiently.
Key Accounting and Reporting Issues for Nonprofits No. 1: Overview and Statement of Financial Position
This material focuses on non-profit organizations organization, accounting and reporting.