NFL vs. Cleveland Tax Authorities: 3rd Down

By now, it’s pretty clear that it’s not about the money for former NFL players Hunter Hillenmeyer and Jeff Saturday.

After tax authorities in Cleveland, Ohio, applied what the athletes said was unfair taxation methods to their incomes, both men sued in separate but similar cases. Hillenmeyer and Saturday want to call attention to the fact that Cleveland taxes visiting athletes at a higher rate than it taxes other individuals who travel to Cleveland to earn money. They're throwing some light on a complex and controversial tax situation.  

Recap of the Tax Applied
Most tax jurisdictions across the nation, including Ohio, use a tax allocation method known as “duty days.” Cleveland, on the other hand, taxes incomes based on the number of games played in that city, a method which results in a much higher tax bill. (More details are available in a previous AccountingWEB article and in a pair of articles published by the New York State Society of CPAs.)

The city, and then the court, said the tax was reasonable. After losing their original cases, Hillenmeyer and Saturday went to the Ohio Board of Appeals, asking for justice. In January, the appeals court also ruled against the athletes.

What’s Next?
Now, with what they perceive as tax fairness at stake, Hillenmeyer and Saturday are going to the next round – taking their cases to the Ohio State Supreme Court. (Cases that are lost in the Ohio Board of Appeals are automatically accepted by the state Supreme Court.) 

Some critics have said the men were highly paid during their football careers and should drop it and pay “their fair share,” rather than wasting court time over a few thousand dollars. But Hillenmeyer and Saturday have their sites on a bigger goal.

Going forward, they want to see Cleveland tax visiting athletes the same way it taxes anyone else, regardless of profession. If that happens, Cleveland would stand to lose roughly a million dollars a year in tax revenue. With states and municipalities across the nation searching for ways to increase tax revenue, it’s unlikely Cleveland will give up without continuing the fight.

Related articles:

Ohio Board of Tax Appeals Says No Relief for Two Former NFL Players
NFL Players Call Personal Tax Foul on Cleveland


You may like these other stories...

Camp Hopes Estate Tax Will Be on Its Way OutAn article in Bloomberg said that Republicans are considering voting this year to repeal the U.S. estate tax, according to House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R.-Mich.). He...
Senate Takes Different Approach from House for Highway and Bridge FundEarlier this week, according to a New York Times article, the Senate agreed to fill the coffers of the fund that pays for highway and bridge repairs with...
There it stands, your client's 100-year-old, rickety, vermin-infested barn or former hotel or whatever the darn thing once was. And she's considering what to do with it. There are two words that can help her decide...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.
Aug 20
In this session we'll review best practices for how to generate interest in your firm’s services.
Aug 21
Meet budgets and client expectations using project management skills geared toward the unique challenges faced by CPAs. Kristen Rampe will share how knowing the keys to structuring and executing a successful project can make the difference between success and repeated failures.
Aug 28
Excel spreadsheets are often akin to the American Wild West, where users can input anything they want into any worksheet cell. Excel's Data Validation feature allows you to restrict user inputs to selected choices, but there are many nuances to the feature that often trip users up.