New Directive to Fight Stolen Identity Fraud

The Justice Department's Tax Division has issued a new directive to further the efforts of the Tax Division and the US Attorneys' offices to respond quickly and effectively to the grave challenges in stolen identity refund fraud (SIRF) cases.

Tax Division Directive 144
Tax Division Directive 144, which takes effect on October 1, 2012, will allow prosecutors in US Attorneys' offices that designate a point of contact for SIRF cases to open tax-related grand jury investigations, to charge by complaint criminals who are engaged in SIRF crimes, and to obtain seizure warrants for forfeiture of criminally derived proceeds arising from SIRF crimes, all without prior authorization from the Tax Division.
 
To ensure fair and consistent nationwide enforcement of tax laws, the Tax Division has supervision over virtually all criminal proceedings arising under the internal revenue laws. Tax refund fraud involving the use of stolen identities has emerged as fast-growing and insidious crime that is all-too-simple in its execution. Strong coordination at all levels of law enforcement is vital to combating these criminals. The Tax Division has issued Directive 144 to further these coordination efforts.

Warn Your Clients

What should your clients do if their tax records were affected by identity theft?

  • If they receive a notice from IRS, they should respond immediately.
  • If they believe someone may have used their SSN fraudulently, they should notify the IRS immediately by responding to the name and number printed on the notice or letter.
  • They will need to fill out the IRS Identity Theft Affidavit, Form 14039
  • Victims of identity theft, who have previously been in contact with the IRS and have not achieved a resolution, can contact the IRS Identity Protection Specialized Unit at (800) 908-4490.
 
 
SIRF Crimes Harm American Taxpayers
SIRF crimes covered by Directive 144 involve the filing or attempted filing of fraudulent tax refund claims, using personal identification information, such as Social Security numbers, that have either been stolen or are otherwise being unlawfully used. When a stolen identity is used to commit tax refund fraud, tax dollars are paid out to fraudsters and all honest taxpayers are victims. An individual taxpayer whose personal identification information is misused to file false refunds will receive any rightfully due refund from the IRS, but may nonetheless experience burdens and delays in the process. In specific cases, the most vulnerable in our country have been personally victimized by this form of identity theft, and one recent prosecution resulted in a conviction for the murder of a postal worker by a thief seeking access to erroneous refunds.
 
Expedited Prosecution Procedures Also Announced
The Tax Division has retained its authority in SIRF cases to review and authorize the filing of charges by indictment and information. Simultaneous with the issuance of Directive 144, the Tax Division has announced new expedited review procedures in cases involving arrests in jurisdictions where the US Attorney's Office is participating in the procedures established in Directive 144.
 
SIRF convictions have resulted from the investigative efforts of many local and federal law enforcement agencies. Prosecutions in SIRF cases brought by US Attorneys' offices and the Tax Division have resulted in lengthy prison sentences and substantial fines and forfeitures.
 
It is important that the IRS obtain information, through SIRF investigations, to intercept fraudulent tax refund claims before erroneous refunds are sent to fraudsters. The procedures set out in Directive 144 and the new expedited review procedures are designed to facilitate this goal.
 
"Directive 144 and the new expedited review procedures are the result of a collaborative effort between the Tax Division and the U.S. Attorneys' offices to strengthen law enforcement's response to stolen identity refund fraud crimes, which are an affront to all honest taxpayers," said the Tax Division's Assistant Attorney General, Kathryn Keneally. "The prosecution of these crimes is a national priority, and we will continue to look for the most effective ways to bring this conduct to an end and to punish these wrongdoers."
 
"Streamlining the authority to prosecute Stolen Identity Refund Fraud investigations is yet another step toward combating this fast growing crime," said Richard Weber, chief of IRS Criminal Investigation. "We look forward to working with the United States Attorneys in aggressively tackling ID theft which has turned the lives of so many innocent taxpayers upside down when their identities have been stolen by thieves whose sole motivation is greed."
 
Source: September 18, 2012, US Department of Justice Press Release

You may like these other stories...

The head of the IRS has a message for taxpayers and tax preparers who have endured long wait times while on the phone with the tax agency: Call your member of Congress.During his keynote speech at the 69th Annual Meeting of...
Regulators struggle with conflicts in credit ratings and auditsThe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which was created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002, released its third annual report on audits of...
Could the IRS disallow Ice Bucket Challenge charitable contributions?Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve probably heard of – or participated in – the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge.I was...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Aug 26
This webcast will include discussions of recently issued, commonly-applicable Accounting Standards Updates for non-public, non-governmental entities.
Aug 28
Excel spreadsheets are often akin to the American Wild West, where users can input anything they want into any worksheet cell. Excel's Data Validation feature allows you to restrict user inputs to selected choices, but there are many nuances to the feature that often trip users up.
Sep 9
In this session we'll discuss the types of technologies and their uses in a small accounting firm office.
Sep 11
This webcast will include discussions of commonly-applicable Clarified Auditing Standards for audits of non-public, non-governmental entities.