Man Allegedly Falsified Returns to Maximize EITC

The Justice Department announced that it has asked a federal court in Chicago to bar Bruce E. Grant and his business, Quick Check Limited, from preparing tax returns. The civil injunction suit alleges that Grant falsifies customers' income on their tax returns, frequently by fabricating business income and expenses, in order to claim the maximum earned income tax credit (EITC) for them.

The EITC is a refundable credit available to certain low-income people. The maximum credit in 2010 was $5,666. Due to the method used to calculate the EITC, individuals with higher annual incomes may be entitled to a larger credit. Some tax preparers refer to the range of earned income generating a maximum EITC as the "sweet spot." According to the complaint, Grant fabricated businesses and reported fake business income and expenses on his customers' tax returns to achieve reported income in the EITC sweet spot.
 

Preventing EITC Errors

Clients who claim income from self-employment without a Form 1099 should be asked if they have records to support the computation of their income. This may require the preparer to ask probing questions, particularly if clients claims they have no records to support the numbers they give you.

For example, if a client tells you:  
  • She has no Form 1099.
  • She was self-employed cleaning houses.
  • She earned $12,000.
  • She had no expenses related to the cleaning business.
 
Probing questions you might ask include:
  • Do you have records of the amount of money you received from house cleaning?
  • How much did you charge to clean a house?
  • How many houses did you clean?
  • Who provided the cleaning supplies?
  • If you provided the cleaning supplies, how much did you spend weekly?
  • Did you provide your own transportation to the houses you cleaned?
 
– IRS
 
The complaint alleges that Grant pleaded guilty in 2006 to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, based on allegations that Grant charged customers a fee for listing a false dependent on the customers' tax returns. The government now seeks to bar Grant permanently from preparing federal tax returns altogether. According to the complaint, Grant's Social Security number identified him as the paid preparer on 2,555 individual income tax returns prepared in 2011. Of these returns, 2,543 request a refund, an extraordinarily high refund rate of 99.5 percent.
 
Related articles:
 
Source: US Department of Justice
 

You may like these other stories...

A new Gallup survey found that 58 percent of smokers in the United States see increased state and federal taxes on cigarettes as an act of unjust discrimination, while 39 percent believe the tax hikes are justified.The...
Liberal groups object to bill barring taxes on Internet accessThe Internet Tax Freedom Act hasn’t been a controversial bill. In fact, it’s so popular that senators are seeking to pair it up with a far more...
As complex as federal tax can get, at least you're only dealing with one agency: the IRS. But when you get into state and local sales tax, you're coordinating hundreds of jurisdictions that are constantly changing....

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Jul 23
We can’t deny a great divide exists between the expectations and workplace needs of Baby Boomers and Millennials. To create thriving organizational performance, we need to shift the way in which we groom future leaders.
Jul 24
In this presentation Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA revisits the Excel feature you should be using, but probably aren't. The Table feature offers the ability to both boost the integrity of your spreadsheets, but reduce maintenance as well.
Jul 31
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom helps beginners get up to speed in Microsoft Excel. However, even experienced Excel users will learn some new tricks, particularly when David discusses under-utilized aspects of Excel.
Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.