IRS Employees Need More Training in Dealing with Troubled Taxpayers
by Terri Eyden on
By Frank Byrt
Many IRS workers don't have sufficient training in dealing with potentially dangerous taxpayers, despite several programs developed to address such situations, according to a report issued March 12 by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). TIGTA oversees the IRS and investigates threats made against its employees.
The IRS, which has about 100,000 employees at 700 facilities nationwide, developed the Potentially Dangerous Taxpayer (PDT) Program in 1984 to teach employees on how to deal with and report on potentially dangerous interactions with taxpayers.
That was followed in 1999 by the IRS' creation of the Office of Employee Protection (OEP) to administer the PDT Program, which manages a database that contains a list of the names, addresses, and case histories of people who have threatened, assaulted, harassed, or otherwise interfered with the duties of IRS employees.
OEP most recently developed another safety program, the Caution Upon Contact (CAU) Program, which it also administers.
The CAU classification criteria for potentially dangerous taxpayers, includes:
- Threat of physical harm that is less severe or immediate than necessary to satisfy PDT criteria.
- Suicide threat by the taxpayer.
- Filing or threatening to file a frivolous lien or a frivolous criminal or civil action against an IRS employee or contractor or their immediate family.
As of July 2012, the IRS had 2,162 active PDT cases, 4,487 active CAU cases, and 662 PDT cases with pending investigations.
Who Is Considered a Potentially Dangerous Taxpayer?
Here is a summary of the criteria the IRS uses to determine whether a taxpayer warrants Potentially Dangerous Taxpayer (PDT) Program status:
- Taxpayers who physically assault IRS employees, contractors, or members of their immediate family.
- Taxpayers who attempt to intimidate or threaten IRS employees, contractors, or members of their immediate family through specific threats of bodily harm, a show of weapons, the use of animals, or through specific threatening behavior, such as stalking.
- Persons who are active members of groups that advocate violence against IRS employees or against other federal employees.
- Taxpayers who have committed the acts set forth in any of the preceding criteria, but whose acts have been directed against employees or contractors of other governmental agencies.
- Taxpayers who are not classified as PDTs through application of the above criteria, but who have demonstrated a clear propensity toward violence through acts of violent behavior within the previous five years.
TIGTA's review of the administration of the PDT and CAU Programs, summarized in a report dated January 18, 2013, found that although these programs are adequately controlled, some IRS employees who have direct contact with taxpayers have not received sufficient training in them.
For example, TIGTA interviewed 34 IRS employees who have had direct contact with taxpayers and found that 88 percent of them were familiar with the PDT designation, but only 29 percent had heard of the CAU designation. "In addition, only 18 percent of these employees have heard of the OEP and its mission, and only 15 percent responded that they had received specific training on the OEP and the PDT and CAU Programs."
TIGTA also said it found "several threatening incidents by taxpayers that were not reported to the OEP or TIGTA, and other circumstances where training courses and internal guidance for these employees were incomplete or inaccurate."
"The IRS depends upon its employees to recognize dangerous taxpayers and properly report threatening incidents," said J. Russell George, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, in a press release accompanying the TIGTA report. "Failure to report threats or verbal abuse can put other IRS employees at risk."
The importance of such safety programs was brought to the fore in 2010, when an Austin, Texas, man with a history of disputes with the IRS crashed his private plane into an Austin office building that housed IRS employees, killing himself and an IRS worker and injuring many others.
"The February 2010 attack on an IRS facility in Austin, Texas, demonstrates the dangers that IRS employees face in performing their jobs," TIGTA said in the report.
IRS management agreed with TIGTA's recommendations that it train employees annually on the safety programs, keep data for its PDT and CAU lists current, and improve OEP's organizational structure.
- One IRS Attacker Goes to Prison, Others Under Investigation
- Threats to IRS Increase after Fatal Plane Crash
- Deadly Tax Protest in Texas
You may like these other stories...
As anyone who's ever been through a divorce can attest, the pain of parting with your spouse isn't just emotional—the fallout from divorce can wreak financial havoc as well long after the dust in the courtroom...
Former DOJ Tax Division head Kathryn Keneally joining DLA Piper in New YorkGlobal law firm DLA Piper announced on Thursday that Kathryn Keneally, the former head of the US Justice Department Tax Division, is joining the firm...
OECD calls for coordinated fight against corporate tax avoidanceDavid Jolly of the New York Times reported that dozens of countries with the most advanced economies have agreed on principles for concrete action to prevent...
Upcoming CPE Webinars
In this jam-packed presentation Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA will give you a crash-course in creating spreadsheet-based dashboards. A dashboard condenses large amounts of data into a compact space, yet enables the end user to easily drill down into details when warranted.
This webcast will include discussions of important issues in SSARS No. 19 and the current status of proposed changes by the Accounting and Review Services Committee in these statements.
Kristen Rampe will share how to speak and write more effectively by understanding your own and your audience's communication style.
Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.