FASB Clarifies Scope of Balance Sheet Offsetting Disclosures
by Terri Eyden on
By Frank Byrt
On January 31, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet: Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which narrows the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, issued in December 2011.
According to FASB's January 31 news release, the update clarifies that ordinary trade receivables and receivables are not in the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, and, specifically, ASU No. 2011-11 applies only to:
- Repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements; and
- Securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in FASB Accounting Standards Codification® or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement.
In its press release, FASB said it undertook the clarification project in response to concerns expressed by US stakeholders about ASU No. 2011-11's broad definition of financial instruments as well as concerns about increased costs. "After the standard was finalized, companies realized that many contracts have standard commercial provisions that would equate to a master netting arrangement, significantly increasing the cost of compliance at minimal value to financial statement users."
"The Update will reduce unintended costs while providing investors and other users with the information they need to understand the extent to which certain financial instruments are offset pursuant to master netting arrangements," said FASB Technical Director Susan M. Cosper in FASB's press release.
A spokeswoman for the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), which oversees FASB, told AccountingWEB that the clarification came as a result of feedback in the form of twenty-seven comment letters from a variety of organizations, including several accounting firms, financial institutions, and an unsolicited letter from General Motors Vice President and CAO Nick S. Cyprus.
In his letter, Cyprus asked FASB to exclude short-term trade receivables and payables that could result in reporting differences between US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
In ASU No. 2013-01, FASB concluded "that the clarified scope will reduce significantly the operability concerns expressed by preparers while still providing decision-useful information about certain transactions involving master netting arrangements. The amendments provide a user of financial statements with comparable information as it relates to certain reconciling differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP and those financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS."
The new reporting standards apply to annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.
You may like these other stories...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has relaunched its technical agenda web page, which Chairman Russell Golden said will inform visitors at a glance on where any given FASB project stands, the steps it took to...
Tax accounting to be simplified for money-market fundsThe US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted 3-2 on Wednesday for sweeping changes to institutional money-market funds, Emily Chasan, senior editor of...
Read more from Larry Perry here and in the Today's World of Audits archive.AU-C Section 800, Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance With Special Purpose Frameworks, paragraph ....
Upcoming CPE Webinars
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom helps beginners get up to speed in Microsoft Excel. However, even experienced Excel users will learn some new tricks, particularly when David discusses under-utilized aspects of Excel.
FRF for SMEs Series--Measurement and Disclosure Principles for various Consolidations and Business Combinations, Part 4B
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.
In this session we'll review best practices for how to generate interest in your firm’s services.