E-Filing Continues to Grow, Exceeds 80 Percent Goal
by Terri Eyden on
By Christina Camara
Saying that paper tax returns are "steadily becoming a thing of the past," the IRS Oversight Board reports that e-filing of individual tax returns has surpassed an 80 percent goal.
About 81 percent of individual income tax returns were filed electronically in 2012, the IRS Oversight Board reported in its annual report to Congress.
The Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, however, set forth the 80 percent goal for all major individual, business, and tax-exempt returns by 2012. The board estimates the e-filing rate for that broader group of returns to be 71 percent.
"Nevertheless, the board is generally satisfied with the overall steady progress being made in the percent of major tax returns filed electronically, which grew more than four percentage points between 2011 and 2012, and which the board expects to reach 80 percent in the near future," the report said.
The initial goals were challenging, the board states, praising Congress, the IRS, tax preparers, and individual taxpayers for the high rate of electronic filing. "This milestone reflects the culmination of years of effort, innovation, and adaptation," the report states.
"In 1998, about 29 million individual, business, and tax exempt returns were filed electronically with the IRS, while over 135 million returns were filed on paper. However, for 2012, the board estimates that over 136 million tax returns will now be filed electronically, compared to approximately 56 million filed on paper."
The benefits of e-filing are many, including faster refunds, improved accuracy, confirmation that the tax return has been received, and lower processing costs for the IRS. Also, surveys show that individuals who file returns electronically are much more satisfied with the process than those who file on paper.
Other advancements for 2012 include the start of daily tax account processing for individual returns and full implementation of the Form 1040 Modernized e-File (MeF) application. The report noted that not all developments last year were positive, as refunds for about seven million taxpayers early last year were delayed about a week. The computer glitches were corrected by February, the report said.
Challenges include: increasing the electronic filing of employment tax returns, limiting tax fraud, including schemes based on identity theft; and improving computer systems. The entire report can be found on the IRS website.
You may like these other stories...
As mentioned in today’s “Bramwell’s Lunch Beat” via an article from the USA Today, a new report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) found that the IRS doled out $2.8...
London Stock Exchange switches auditing to EYThe London Stock Exchange will drop PwC as its auditor and replace it with EY after completion of the audit for the year ending March 2014, Harriet Agnew of the Financial Times...
With tax season in the past, it's time to think about the tax implications of decisions your clients may be making about their homes in 2014. The rules are complicated and because of the huge amounts involved, the...
Upcoming CPE Webinars
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA introduces you to a powerful but underutilized macro feature in Excel.
This material focuses on the principles of accounting for non-profit organizations' revenues. It will include discussions of revenue recognition for cash and non-cash contributions as well as other revenues commonly received by non-profit organizations.
During the second session of a four-part series on Individual Leadership, the focus will be on time management- a critical success factor for effective leadership. Each person has 24 hours of time to spend each day; the key is making wise investments and knowing what investments yield the greatest return.
This material focuses on the principles of accounting for non-profit organizations’ expenses. It will include discussions of functional expense categories, accounting for functional expenses and allocations of joint costs.