Clayton Kershaw Saves Millions in Taxes, Thanks to Texas
by Teresa Ambord on
Clayton Kershaw just signed a record breaking deal with the Los Angeles Dodgers. So his primary workplace will be southern California, but he’s keeping his Texas address, more than 1,400 miles east. That may have something to do with family issues and the pride of being a Texan. But it’s also a smart money move.
His seven-year, $215 million deal with the Dodgers includes an $18 million signing bonus. That deal set a new record for pitchers in the MLB. Kershaw is a two-time Cy Young Award winner, and at age twenty-five, he has a lot of good years to give.
Chances are, he also has an astute financial adviser. By remaining a Texas resident, Kershaw will bank a lot more of that hefty salary than he would if he changed his residency to California.
Here’s how this breaks down…Texas has no state income tax. California has the nation’s highest state income tax, maxing out at 13.3 percent. The calculation is complex, but one tax specialist says over the life of his contract, Kershaw will save nearly $6.5 million by remaining a Texas resident.
CPA Robert Raiola is the sports and entertainment senior group manager in the Cranford, New Jersey, office of O’Connor Davies, LLP. He ran the numbers, showing how much tax Kershaw would pay as a California resident as opposed to being a Texas resident.
Raiola’s chart below shows the contrast (forgive the squeezed digits). The contract income is broken down year by year.
If Kershaw became a California resident, in seven years he would pay 13.3 percent in state income tax alone, which comes to approximately $26,274,220, said Raiola. He’ll also get a partial deduction on his federal income tax for the state tax paid, reducing his overall tax bill.
However, as a Texas resident, his state tax bill would be a fraction of that. Of course he will owe zero to Texas, which has no state tax. But he will owe nonresident tax on the income earned in California, of about $11,683,189 plus nonresident tax to other states which charge personal income tax of $3,861,220, for a total of $15,544,409. The difference at the end of the contract is $10,729,811 in state taxes saved as a Texas resident.
There are other factors, added Raiola. If he were a California resident, he would get a larger deduction on his federal tax return and a credit on his California tax return for taxes paid to other states, and yet the outcome as a Texas resident is still much greener.
Over the life of the seven year contract, with all elements combined the savings comes out to approximately $6,483,484. Not bad! It does mean Kershaw will have to be aware of how many days he spends in California or he could be deemed an accidental resident.
You may like these other stories...
Legislation coming out of Washington just might reduce homeowners' burden for disaster insurance. It's a topic very much on everyone's minds since the mudslide in Oso, Washington. The loss of human life was...
Divorce is hard, and the IRS isn't going to make it any easier. The IRS generally says "no" to tax deductions that might ease the pain of divorce. In certain circumstances, however, you might be able to salvage...
IRS chief: New rule on the way for tax-exempt groupsIRS Commissioner John Koskinen told the USA Today on Monday that the agency will likely rewrite a proposed rule regulating the political activities of nonprofit groups to...
Upcoming CPE Webinars
Is everyone at your organization meeting your client service expectations? Let client service expert, Kristen Rampe, CPA help you establish a reputation of top-tier service in every facet of your firm during this one hour webinar.
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA introduces you to a powerful but underutilized macro feature in Excel.
This material focuses on the principles of accounting for non-profit organizations' revenues. It will include discussions of revenue recognition for cash and non-cash contributions as well as other revenues commonly received by non-profit organizations.
During the second session of a four-part series on Individual Leadership, the focus will be on time management- a critical success factor for effective leadership. Each person has 24 hours of time to spend each day; the key is making wise investments and knowing what investments yield the greatest return.